Category Archives: Surveillance State

Balko’s Morning Links

Check out Radley Balko’s Morning Links.  Highlights include:

  • How the American war on drugs is “one of the most catastrophic foreign policy mistakes in American history”.   I agree.  Whatever it started as, the drug war is now nothing more than a jobs program for testosterone-flooded neanderthals and it’s only accomplishment is bringing misery and destruction to people who engage in an activity that should never have been illegal in the first place.  The fact that it has now enveloped the entire Western Hemisphere in an unstoppable and ever escalating cycle of corruption and violence fits well with a foreign policy whose main goal seems to be pissing the rest of the world off.
  • Mother Jones inadvertently makes the case that banning assault weapons would probably have zero effect in reducing mass shootings.  Not that reasoning or  effectiveness actually play much of a role in any conflict between team left and team right.
  • The DEA (those folks who, as a condition for employment, are required to swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution) thinks it can come onto your property and set up surveillance cameras to record your activities in order to catch you in a crime, all without a warrant, of course.  Folks, this goes right to that stunningly ignorant belief (and you hear this a lot from libertarians) that it’s the government’s job to protect the rights of citizens.  It is not.  The government is, in fact, the biggest threat to citizens’ rights.  Government serves government.  Only the public, in large enough numbers, can protect citizens from abuses of power by the government.  And, I might point out that the public is notoriously incompetent in this mission.

The newest in anti-drone fashions

New York artist Adam Harvey has teamed up with a fashion designer, Johanna Bloomfield, to create a line of clothing that offers protection against aerial drone surveillance.  The article also mentions the artist’s past involvement in thwarting the security state by using make-up to defeat facial recognition software.

Of course, there are other ways to stave off facial recognition (at least in places where it hasn’t been prohibited):

Anonymous_at_Scientology_in_Los_Angeles

I appreciate the message of Harvey and Bloomfield.  The uncritical acceptance of the surveillance state amazes me.  As long as the government doesn’t interrupt the next episode of Dancing with the Stars, the public really doesn’t seem to care what it does.  The dominant attitude seems to be, if you haven’t done anything wrong, you should have nothing to hide.